Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performance. Show all posts

Review: Nikon D300 solid as a little tank

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

art.nikon.d300.jpg

(CNET) -- When you build the follow-up to a hot camera, how do you turn up the heat? When Nikon shipped the D200 a couple of years ago, its combination of speed and photo quality blew away the limited competition, and provided a powerful, relatively inexpensive alternative to Nikon's then top-of-the-line D2X.

The D300 faces a far more crowded field. Not only does it take on its venerable and now lower-priced predecessor, but also a cluster of far-from-shabby dSLRs just at or below its price: the Canon EOS 40D, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A700, the Olympus E-3, and the Pentax K20D.

Nikon's offering a body-only box of the D300 as well as two kits: one with a DX 18mm-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF lens (27mm-202.5mm equivalent with the camera's 1.5x crop factor) and one with a DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens (27mm-300mm equivalent). I tested the latter kit, and also used the camera with two non-DX lenses: a preproduction version of the 14-24mm 2.8G ED and the 24-70mm f/2.8G ED IF.

For the most part, Nikon sticks with the tried-and-true body design and interface of the D200, with its intelligently laid out controls. The dust- and weatherproof body weighs a hair over 2 pounds, and feels as solid as a little tank.

The viewfinder is bigger and brighter, with 100 percent coverage. There are a few behaviors I'm not fond of, like the hard to manipulate metering dial (discussed in my more-detailed analysis of the design) and occasionally problematic AF-mode navigation (discussed below), but find the camera's operation comfortable and fluid. Nikon carries over the ultraflexible user-settings menus, which consists of two banks--shooting settings and custom settings--with four nameable slots each.

Though the DX-format (23.6x15.8 mm), 12-megapixel CMOS sensor is new, the D300 otherwise retains the raft of features that made the D200 so powerful, plus some high-profile enhancements. Most notably, the D300 increases to 51 AF points with 15 cross-type sensors, which contributes to the camera's new 3D-tracking 51-point Dynamic Area AF mode, and replaces the Group Dynamic AF of its predecessor. Essentially, the D300's 1,005-point 3D color matrix meter does double duty, feeding a low-resolution digitized version of the scene to the new Multi-Cam 3500DX AF module for tracking analysis. (You can see an interesting video simulation of it on YouTube.)

Based on the description (and the suggested use in the manual), the 3D tracking mode seems like an optimal solution for shooting well-defined subjects--those with strong color contrast relative to the background and which occupy a large percentage of the scene--that remain within the frame. And in shoots at a local dog run, it worked best for portrait-type situations, where it tracked the dogs' wildly moving heads while they themselves remained relatively stationary within the frame. However, for shots where the subject moves too quickly to keep in the viewfinder--as happens with most of the other dog-run shots--Nikon suggests using the 51-point dynamic AF without the 3D tracking. That works relatively well. (You can also choose 21-point or nine-point without 3D.)

Unfortunately, if you need to switch quickly between those two AF options, as I do in the aforementioned scenario, you're out of luck. There's no direct-access control and you can't assign the selection to one of the three custom buttons; the closest you can get is to add it to My Menu, or waste an entire custom setting bank for that one feature. For me, since the 51-point without 3D is the more generally useful of the two modes, the 3D tracking will just be woefully underutilized, and might as well not be there at all. And frankly, I miss the AF-group visual feedback provided by the D200.

The same goes for the D300's Live View shooting. Like the 40D, it supports autofocus, but the D300 uses the typical too-many-mirror-flips implementation that makes it far less useful than it could be. There's actually a flow chart in the manual explaining the series of steps it takes to shoot in Live View--with a tripod it can use contrast AF, which doesn't require the constant mirror flippage. It is neither complicated, nor the shooting experience one should expect.

Like Canon, Nikon has a lot invested in lens-based optical-image stabilization technology, so the D300 lacks the in-body sensor-shift stabilization that Sony, Pentax, Olympus, and Panasonic offer. That's not a big deal if you already have an investment in Nikon's VR lenses or don't really use/care about stabilization. But if you do care about it and making your first dSLR purchase, or contemplating shifting from another brand, then don't discount its importance; the fact that the two kits require a choice between VR and non-VR lenses foreshadows future lens choices you'll have to make.

Other boosts over the D200 include an upgrade to a 3-inch LCD with a 170-degree viewing angle, a stop higher on the sensitivity scale to an effective ISO 100-6,400, the addition of a 14-bit raw mode, and an HDMI connector for optimal HDTV output. Before going into production, Nikon dropped the Virtual Horizon capability (which did make it into the D3). Nice features carried over from the D200 include built-in wireless flash control; selectable 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, or 13mm center-spot for center-weighted metering; and a shutter-speed range of 1/8,000 to 30 seconds. (For a complete list of the D300's features and capabilities, check out the PDF manual.)

There's nothing to complain about with the D300's shooting speed--though it delivers average performance for its class, the D300 does belong to a pretty zippy class of cameras, and it outpaces the D200 on a few tasks. CNET Labs' tests indicate that it wakes up and shoots near instantly, in about 0.1 second. Under good, high-contrast lighting, it focuses and shoots in just under half a second, rising to 0.9 second in dimmer conditions.

Typically, it captures consecutive frames in the same half second, edging up to 0.6 second with the built-in flash enabled. And it delivers a quick 5.8 frames per second for high-speed burst shooting. (We tested without the optional battery grip, which brings the speed closer to 7fps.) Nikon traditionally delivers excellent low-light focus performance in its dSLRs, and the D300 is no exception. Even shooting a black cat sitting in the shadows of a dimly lit apartment proved no problem.

As for photo quality, the D300 delivers great results, with a visibly superior noise profile to the D200 as well as to the Sony DSLR-A700 (which uses the same sensor). At their best, photos are sharp, with excellent exposures, accurate colors, and broad tonal ranges. Flash with the SB-800 Speedlight unit especially showed off how well the metering system works, with none of the harsh, overexposed look that I frequently get on the most difficult shots. (For more details on the photo quality, click through the slide show.)

Although the lack of in-body stabilization can be a big liability for certain users, and its interface not quite as streamlined as I'd like, these negatives are more than offset by the great performance and class-leading photo quality delivered by the Nikon D300--earning it an Editors' Choice.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

Review: Nikon D300 solid as a little tank

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

art.nikon.d300.jpg

(CNET) -- When you build the follow-up to a hot camera, how do you turn up the heat? When Nikon shipped the D200 a couple of years ago, its combination of speed and photo quality blew away the limited competition, and provided a powerful, relatively inexpensive alternative to Nikon's then top-of-the-line D2X.

The D300 faces a far more crowded field. Not only does it take on its venerable and now lower-priced predecessor, but also a cluster of far-from-shabby dSLRs just at or below its price: the Canon EOS 40D, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A700, the Olympus E-3, and the Pentax K20D.

Nikon's offering a body-only box of the D300 as well as two kits: one with a DX 18mm-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF lens (27mm-202.5mm equivalent with the camera's 1.5x crop factor) and one with a DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens (27mm-300mm equivalent). I tested the latter kit, and also used the camera with two non-DX lenses: a preproduction version of the 14-24mm 2.8G ED and the 24-70mm f/2.8G ED IF.

For the most part, Nikon sticks with the tried-and-true body design and interface of the D200, with its intelligently laid out controls. The dust- and weatherproof body weighs a hair over 2 pounds, and feels as solid as a little tank.

The viewfinder is bigger and brighter, with 100 percent coverage. There are a few behaviors I'm not fond of, like the hard to manipulate metering dial (discussed in my more-detailed analysis of the design) and occasionally problematic AF-mode navigation (discussed below), but find the camera's operation comfortable and fluid. Nikon carries over the ultraflexible user-settings menus, which consists of two banks--shooting settings and custom settings--with four nameable slots each.

Though the DX-format (23.6x15.8 mm), 12-megapixel CMOS sensor is new, the D300 otherwise retains the raft of features that made the D200 so powerful, plus some high-profile enhancements. Most notably, the D300 increases to 51 AF points with 15 cross-type sensors, which contributes to the camera's new 3D-tracking 51-point Dynamic Area AF mode, and replaces the Group Dynamic AF of its predecessor. Essentially, the D300's 1,005-point 3D color matrix meter does double duty, feeding a low-resolution digitized version of the scene to the new Multi-Cam 3500DX AF module for tracking analysis. (You can see an interesting video simulation of it on YouTube.)

Based on the description (and the suggested use in the manual), the 3D tracking mode seems like an optimal solution for shooting well-defined subjects--those with strong color contrast relative to the background and which occupy a large percentage of the scene--that remain within the frame. And in shoots at a local dog run, it worked best for portrait-type situations, where it tracked the dogs' wildly moving heads while they themselves remained relatively stationary within the frame. However, for shots where the subject moves too quickly to keep in the viewfinder--as happens with most of the other dog-run shots--Nikon suggests using the 51-point dynamic AF without the 3D tracking. That works relatively well. (You can also choose 21-point or nine-point without 3D.)

Unfortunately, if you need to switch quickly between those two AF options, as I do in the aforementioned scenario, you're out of luck. There's no direct-access control and you can't assign the selection to one of the three custom buttons; the closest you can get is to add it to My Menu, or waste an entire custom setting bank for that one feature. For me, since the 51-point without 3D is the more generally useful of the two modes, the 3D tracking will just be woefully underutilized, and might as well not be there at all. And frankly, I miss the AF-group visual feedback provided by the D200.

The same goes for the D300's Live View shooting. Like the 40D, it supports autofocus, but the D300 uses the typical too-many-mirror-flips implementation that makes it far less useful than it could be. There's actually a flow chart in the manual explaining the series of steps it takes to shoot in Live View--with a tripod it can use contrast AF, which doesn't require the constant mirror flippage. It is neither complicated, nor the shooting experience one should expect.

Like Canon, Nikon has a lot invested in lens-based optical-image stabilization technology, so the D300 lacks the in-body sensor-shift stabilization that Sony, Pentax, Olympus, and Panasonic offer. That's not a big deal if you already have an investment in Nikon's VR lenses or don't really use/care about stabilization. But if you do care about it and making your first dSLR purchase, or contemplating shifting from another brand, then don't discount its importance; the fact that the two kits require a choice between VR and non-VR lenses foreshadows future lens choices you'll have to make.

Other boosts over the D200 include an upgrade to a 3-inch LCD with a 170-degree viewing angle, a stop higher on the sensitivity scale to an effective ISO 100-6,400, the addition of a 14-bit raw mode, and an HDMI connector for optimal HDTV output. Before going into production, Nikon dropped the Virtual Horizon capability (which did make it into the D3). Nice features carried over from the D200 include built-in wireless flash control; selectable 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, or 13mm center-spot for center-weighted metering; and a shutter-speed range of 1/8,000 to 30 seconds. (For a complete list of the D300's features and capabilities, check out the PDF manual.)

There's nothing to complain about with the D300's shooting speed--though it delivers average performance for its class, the D300 does belong to a pretty zippy class of cameras, and it outpaces the D200 on a few tasks. CNET Labs' tests indicate that it wakes up and shoots near instantly, in about 0.1 second. Under good, high-contrast lighting, it focuses and shoots in just under half a second, rising to 0.9 second in dimmer conditions.

Typically, it captures consecutive frames in the same half second, edging up to 0.6 second with the built-in flash enabled. And it delivers a quick 5.8 frames per second for high-speed burst shooting. (We tested without the optional battery grip, which brings the speed closer to 7fps.) Nikon traditionally delivers excellent low-light focus performance in its dSLRs, and the D300 is no exception. Even shooting a black cat sitting in the shadows of a dimly lit apartment proved no problem.

As for photo quality, the D300 delivers great results, with a visibly superior noise profile to the D200 as well as to the Sony DSLR-A700 (which uses the same sensor). At their best, photos are sharp, with excellent exposures, accurate colors, and broad tonal ranges. Flash with the SB-800 Speedlight unit especially showed off how well the metering system works, with none of the harsh, overexposed look that I frequently get on the most difficult shots. (For more details on the photo quality, click through the slide show.)

Although the lack of in-body stabilization can be a big liability for certain users, and its interface not quite as streamlined as I'd like, these negatives are more than offset by the great performance and class-leading photo quality delivered by the Nikon D300--earning it an Editors' Choice.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

Review: Nikon D300 solid as a little tank

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

art.nikon.d300.jpg

(CNET) -- When you build the follow-up to a hot camera, how do you turn up the heat? When Nikon shipped the D200 a couple of years ago, its combination of speed and photo quality blew away the limited competition, and provided a powerful, relatively inexpensive alternative to Nikon's then top-of-the-line D2X.

The D300 faces a far more crowded field. Not only does it take on its venerable and now lower-priced predecessor, but also a cluster of far-from-shabby dSLRs just at or below its price: the Canon EOS 40D, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A700, the Olympus E-3, and the Pentax K20D.

Nikon's offering a body-only box of the D300 as well as two kits: one with a DX 18mm-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF lens (27mm-202.5mm equivalent with the camera's 1.5x crop factor) and one with a DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens (27mm-300mm equivalent). I tested the latter kit, and also used the camera with two non-DX lenses: a preproduction version of the 14-24mm 2.8G ED and the 24-70mm f/2.8G ED IF.

For the most part, Nikon sticks with the tried-and-true body design and interface of the D200, with its intelligently laid out controls. The dust- and weatherproof body weighs a hair over 2 pounds, and feels as solid as a little tank.

The viewfinder is bigger and brighter, with 100 percent coverage. There are a few behaviors I'm not fond of, like the hard to manipulate metering dial (discussed in my more-detailed analysis of the design) and occasionally problematic AF-mode navigation (discussed below), but find the camera's operation comfortable and fluid. Nikon carries over the ultraflexible user-settings menus, which consists of two banks--shooting settings and custom settings--with four nameable slots each.

Though the DX-format (23.6x15.8 mm), 12-megapixel CMOS sensor is new, the D300 otherwise retains the raft of features that made the D200 so powerful, plus some high-profile enhancements. Most notably, the D300 increases to 51 AF points with 15 cross-type sensors, which contributes to the camera's new 3D-tracking 51-point Dynamic Area AF mode, and replaces the Group Dynamic AF of its predecessor. Essentially, the D300's 1,005-point 3D color matrix meter does double duty, feeding a low-resolution digitized version of the scene to the new Multi-Cam 3500DX AF module for tracking analysis. (You can see an interesting video simulation of it on YouTube.)

Based on the description (and the suggested use in the manual), the 3D tracking mode seems like an optimal solution for shooting well-defined subjects--those with strong color contrast relative to the background and which occupy a large percentage of the scene--that remain within the frame. And in shoots at a local dog run, it worked best for portrait-type situations, where it tracked the dogs' wildly moving heads while they themselves remained relatively stationary within the frame. However, for shots where the subject moves too quickly to keep in the viewfinder--as happens with most of the other dog-run shots--Nikon suggests using the 51-point dynamic AF without the 3D tracking. That works relatively well. (You can also choose 21-point or nine-point without 3D.)

Unfortunately, if you need to switch quickly between those two AF options, as I do in the aforementioned scenario, you're out of luck. There's no direct-access control and you can't assign the selection to one of the three custom buttons; the closest you can get is to add it to My Menu, or waste an entire custom setting bank for that one feature. For me, since the 51-point without 3D is the more generally useful of the two modes, the 3D tracking will just be woefully underutilized, and might as well not be there at all. And frankly, I miss the AF-group visual feedback provided by the D200.

The same goes for the D300's Live View shooting. Like the 40D, it supports autofocus, but the D300 uses the typical too-many-mirror-flips implementation that makes it far less useful than it could be. There's actually a flow chart in the manual explaining the series of steps it takes to shoot in Live View--with a tripod it can use contrast AF, which doesn't require the constant mirror flippage. It is neither complicated, nor the shooting experience one should expect.

Like Canon, Nikon has a lot invested in lens-based optical-image stabilization technology, so the D300 lacks the in-body sensor-shift stabilization that Sony, Pentax, Olympus, and Panasonic offer. That's not a big deal if you already have an investment in Nikon's VR lenses or don't really use/care about stabilization. But if you do care about it and making your first dSLR purchase, or contemplating shifting from another brand, then don't discount its importance; the fact that the two kits require a choice between VR and non-VR lenses foreshadows future lens choices you'll have to make.

Other boosts over the D200 include an upgrade to a 3-inch LCD with a 170-degree viewing angle, a stop higher on the sensitivity scale to an effective ISO 100-6,400, the addition of a 14-bit raw mode, and an HDMI connector for optimal HDTV output. Before going into production, Nikon dropped the Virtual Horizon capability (which did make it into the D3). Nice features carried over from the D200 include built-in wireless flash control; selectable 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, or 13mm center-spot for center-weighted metering; and a shutter-speed range of 1/8,000 to 30 seconds. (For a complete list of the D300's features and capabilities, check out the PDF manual.)

There's nothing to complain about with the D300's shooting speed--though it delivers average performance for its class, the D300 does belong to a pretty zippy class of cameras, and it outpaces the D200 on a few tasks. CNET Labs' tests indicate that it wakes up and shoots near instantly, in about 0.1 second. Under good, high-contrast lighting, it focuses and shoots in just under half a second, rising to 0.9 second in dimmer conditions.

Typically, it captures consecutive frames in the same half second, edging up to 0.6 second with the built-in flash enabled. And it delivers a quick 5.8 frames per second for high-speed burst shooting. (We tested without the optional battery grip, which brings the speed closer to 7fps.) Nikon traditionally delivers excellent low-light focus performance in its dSLRs, and the D300 is no exception. Even shooting a black cat sitting in the shadows of a dimly lit apartment proved no problem.

As for photo quality, the D300 delivers great results, with a visibly superior noise profile to the D200 as well as to the Sony DSLR-A700 (which uses the same sensor). At their best, photos are sharp, with excellent exposures, accurate colors, and broad tonal ranges. Flash with the SB-800 Speedlight unit especially showed off how well the metering system works, with none of the harsh, overexposed look that I frequently get on the most difficult shots. (For more details on the photo quality, click through the slide show.)

Although the lack of in-body stabilization can be a big liability for certain users, and its interface not quite as streamlined as I'd like, these negatives are more than offset by the great performance and class-leading photo quality delivered by the Nikon D300--earning it an Editors' Choice.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

Ultra-mobile future beckons for PCs

Monday, January 21, 2008

The desktop PC's days of dominance could be numbered as laptops and ultra-mobile PCs begin to reap the benefit of ever greater, and more efficient, computing power.

"We want to be mobile and not tethered to our desks anymore - we can take our computing power with us," said Mooly Eden, general manager of the mobile platform group at Intel.

"Today's laptops have more processing power than all the computers that took the Apollo rocket to the moon," he added.

Laptop sales are expected to overtake desktop sales around the world by 2009 as the shift to an untethered computer experience accelerates.

"Consumers want the performance of a desktop - they are not willing to compromise," said Mr Eden. "They want battery life, they want wi-fi connectivity and good form factor."

Intel is pushing hard into the mobile space. At CES this week the company announced five processors for laptops, using its latest chip designs made up of transistors with features just 45 billionths of a metre in size.

Toshiba UMPC
Today's ultra mobile PCs have the same power as 2005's laptops

It also announced a new dedicated chip set, called Menlow, which will power a new generation of ultra mobile computers.

"Much of our future, in terms of volume, is going to be in this area," Paul Otellini, chief executive of Intel told BBC News.

Sales of so-called Ultra Mobile PCs (UMPC), which were first launched in 2006, have been modest, but Mr Otellini said the market was still evolving.

"Ultra mobility is the ability to access all of your information, get in touch with anyone you want to, collaborate with anyone, and run any application you want from anywhere on the planet," said Dennis Moore, chief executive of OQO, which builds UMPCs.

He added: "It's about getting the same kind of connectivity and performance as sitting at your desktop PC."

Companies such as Samsung, iRiver, Lenovo, LG and Toshiba have committed to building these mobile devices.

At CES Mr Otellini showed off a Toshiba portable computer about the size of a paperback book running Windows Vista.

"The Menlow-powered device from Toshiba has the same performance as the most powerful Centrino laptop two years ago," he told BBC News.

Intel gave the Centrino label to a combination of chipset and wi-fi technologies optimised for mobile computers.

Key issue

"We will have dual and quad-core processors in these devices in just a couple of years," he added.

The relationship between computing power and battery life was the key issue in making portable computers practical, said Mr Eden.

"More performance means more transistors and more transistors means more power and more power is less battery life; that is a problem for laptops," said Mr Eden.

Power efficiency

The crucial development for ultra mobile devices is the power efficiency afforded by the latest chip designs.

Intel's Menlow chip set is five times smaller and consumes 10 times less power than ultra low voltage mobile processors introduced in 2006.

Soon you will be able to have connected experience everywhere you go

Mr Moore said: "Power is not an issue on a desktop, because a giant fan can suck the heat out of the machine; it is in a UMPC.

"You can measure the progress because a typical UMPC is smaller than the fan in a typical desktop computer."

He added: "Today's chips do not overheat, do not drain the battery in an hour."

Lightweight machine

The goal, said Mr Eden, was to build laptops - and UMPCs - which could run off a battery for an entire day.

Companies such as Qualcomm are also building processors to drive a new generation of lightweight computers. It unveiled two designs, called Anchorage and Fairbanks, at CES.

Other firms committed to a new generation of mobile computers include Taiwanese firm Asus, which has enjoyed success with its Eee PC - a lightweight machine, which can run Windows XP, and uses solid state drives instead of hard drives to keep the weight down and improve reliability.

Mr Eden said: "Moving to solid state drives is inevitable. This is a revolution that must happen. They have many advantages compared to rotational drives - they consume less power, they are more reliable because you don't have moving parts.

"This is the optimal solution for notebooks. The only problem today is the pricing. And for that reason economies of scale will play its game."

Solid state drives are more expensive to manufacture than hard drives as they are built from silicon - and lack the higher storage functionality of a hard drive.

However, Bit Micro are expected to announce a 2.5in 832 Gigabyte solid state drive at CES, closing the gap on hard disks.

For maximum mobility, Toshiba and Samsung both unveiled 1.8in solid state drives that can hold 128 GB of data.

Wireless broadband

Drives like this will start to make their way into devices in the coming months, along with other technologies such as Wimax.

The next generation wireless broadband will be introduced into a device from OQO later this year.

Its current flagship UMPC, the e2, can run Windows Vista operating system and can also connect to the net over wi-fi and 3.5G mobile networks.

At CES on Monday Asus also announced it would release a Wimax-enabled version of its Eee PC.

Mr Otellini said Intel too was looking to roll out Wimax in its chips designed for laptops in 2008.

"Soon you will be able to have a connected experience everywhere you go," said Mr Moore.

"You won't need to worry about finding a wireless hotspot and with improvements in battery life and power efficiency you won't need to worry about recharging," he added.

In pictures Fighting back Human sacrifice

Source from: news.bbc.co.uk

Review: Toshiba laptop a solid choice for gamers on a budget

Friday, November 30, 2007

art.toshiba.satellite.jpg

(CNET.com) -- The current flood of excellent gaming laptops (Dell's XPS M1730, HP/Voodoo's Envy, and Alienware's m9750) means that PC gamers have plenty of choices when it comes to picking a new mobile rig.

To break through the clutter, Toshiba, not exactly the first name that comes to mind when you think of gaming, would have to offer something special. By putting dual SLI Nvidia GeForce 8600M GPUs in its standard 17-inch Satellite chassis for as little as $1,999, the company has done just that. Our slightly upgraded Satellite X205-SLi3 cost a little more at $2,499, but that's still a few hundred dollars less than the cheapest SLI configurations from Alienware or Dell (although they start with the higher-end Nvidia 8700). If you're looking to harness the power of dual video cards without sending your bank account into the red, the X205 walks the fine line between mainstream and gamer.

From the outside, the Satellite X205 is nearly identical to the other laptops in Toshiba's current lineup, such as the Satellite P205, with the same rounded edges, black accents, and silver interior. The back of the lid has a subtle red-on-black design, which Toshiba calls Flare Carmine. As a fixed configuration, the color scheme and components cannot be customized. At almost 9 pounds without the A/C adapter, it's a big, bulky machine, but still about 2 pounds lighter than the massive Dell XPS M1730. Our main gripe is the giant "TOSHIBA" emblazoned in 1-inch silver letters across the laptop's lid and the backlit Satellite logo on the front edge. A little branding is fine, but it makes you feel like a walking billboard.

The X205's keyboard has a somewhat uncomfortably shortened space bar, but at least it also manages to fit in a full numeric keypad. Since it's a Toshiba, we know that there will be separate page-up and page-down keys, which is usually the first thing other laptop makers cut. Above the keyboard sits a row of basic media controls and quick-launch buttons for your media player and Web browser, as well as Toshiba's standard Harman-Kardon speakers, giving you four speakers plus a subwoofer, and excellent (for a laptop) sound. For a more multimedia experience, with better media controls but without the SLI graphics, Toshiba's Qosmio line is a longtime favorite.

The 17-inch wide-screen LCD display offers a 1,680 x 1,050 native resolution, which is standard for a screen this size, but not as high as the 1,920 x 1,200 resolution found in higher-end 17-inch laptops such as the Dell XPS M1730. The display is clear and bright, but slightly too glossy for our tastes, picking up a lot of light reflections from the room.

By offering inexpensive SLI, we suspected that the X205 might skimp on other ports and connections, but the laptop packs in just about everything we'd want, including an HDMI output, Bluetooth, 802.11n Wi-Fi, and a bundled external USB TV tuner and Media Center remote control. The cheaper $1,999 version (called the X205-SLi1) includes these extras, but drops the screen resolution to 1,440x900, the hard drive from 320GB to 240GB, and the CPU from an Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 to a slower T7250.

In our performance benchmarks, the X205 was a strong performer, only marginally slower than systems with faster processors -- the Voodoo Envy (T7700) and the Dell XPS M1730 (X7900). At these speeds, the minor performance differences in most applications will be transparent to users. With dual GPUs as its main selling point, it's the X205's gaming performance that's important. Even though the DirectX 10 Nvidia GeForce Go 8600M GT isn't the top of Nvidia's line, the dual chips provided decent frame rates, even if it couldn't touch the faster (and much more expensive) SLI Nvidia 8700 GPUs found in the Dell XPS M1730. The system easily beat Voodoo's recent 15-inch gaming laptop, the Voodoo Envy M:152. In anecdotal testing, we loaded up EA's Crysis, a challenging, resource-hungry game for any PC to run. After struggling to run the game on several laptops, we were pleasantly surprised to find it working well on the X205 at a reasonable 1,024x768 resolution, with the visual options all set to medium.

Unfortunately, battery life is the Achilles' heel of this otherwise impressive system. At only 65 minutes on our DVD battery drain test, this was one of the shortest-lived laptops, desktop replacement or otherwise, we've seen. Even the XPS M1730, with more powerful components (and more flashing lights), managed to run for closer to 90 minutes.

Toshiba backs the Satellite P205-S6237 with an industry-standard one-year warranty; extending the warranty to three years costs $134, with express and onsite upgrades available for an additional fee. Support is accessible through a 24-7 toll-free phone line, an online knowledge base, and both a carry- and mail-in repair service.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

Review: Samsung LCD HDTV will impress the staunchest videophile

Thursday, November 22, 2007

art.samsung_ln-t4681.jpg

(CNET.com) -- Among that tiny segment of the population that cares about the latest HDTV technology, and the even tinier segment that can afford it, the introduction of Samsung's 81 series of flat-panel LCDs is kind of like early Christmas. The first widely distributed LCD HDTVs to incorporate LED backlights -- Sony sold a few Qualia 005s a couple years ago at $8,000 to $15,000 a pop -- the Samsungs promise amazing black levels, claiming a contrast ratio spec of 500,000:1.

The subject of this review, the 46-inch LN-T4681F, does indeed offer the amazing ability to basically disappear in a dark room when displaying a dark scene. That's a tremendous accomplishment for any display, but in the end it's not quite enough to earn our highest praise, because the TV's poor off-angle performance and shiny screen hobble its real-world picture quality in the face of stiff competition, especially given its premium price point.

Those issues aside, there's no doubt the Samsung LN-T4681F will make videophiles who can afford it grin with pleasure every time the screen fades to black.

Leave it to Samsung to put together yet another ultrasleek HDTV. The LN-T4681F continues the company's trend of clothing its panels entirely in glossy black, although this model takes things a step further with a few noteworthy accents. The most noticeable consists of a pair of vertical clear acrylic strips running along either edge of the panel. Cupped to deflect sound from the side-mounted speakers into the room, they also serve to support another pair of vertical strips, these made of solid dark gray material that seems a bit out of place among all that gloss.

The overall effect, especially considering the rather wide expanse of glossy black frame between the screen and the clear strips, is of a very wide HDTV; an effect that's further enhanced by the relatively narrow top and bottom sections of the frame around the screen. All told, the LN-T4681F measures 48.4 by 29.6 by 12.6 inches and weighs about 77 pounds including the swivel stand; sans stand, it measures 48.4 by 27 by 4.4 inches and weighs 66 pounds.

Unfortunately the LN-T4681F is saddled with the same shiny screen we complained about during our review of the LN-T4665F. While it catches the eye on the sales floor and lets you check your hair, those benefits are outweighed by its distracting reflectivity under normal room lighting (see Performance).

Samsung's remote is almost the same as last year, and we generally found that the slender wand was easy to operate. Only the keys for volume, channel, and device control (the universal clicker can command four other pieces of gear) are illuminated, but that's better than most TV remotes, which skip backlighting altogether. All of the buttons are nicely separated and differentiated, with the exception of the secondary controls clustered at the clicker's base, which kind of blend together. We'd like to see dedicated buttons for each input, although because the set automatically senses and skips inactive inputs, cycling between sources is less arduous than usual. The menu system is easy to navigate, and we appreciated the text explanations that accompanied the selections.

Features

The reason the Samsung LN-T4681F costs significantly more than any LCD TV at its screen size has to do with its backlight. On flat-panel LCDs, the backlight is what powers the picture, and it's generally made of cold-cathode fluorescents (CCFL). Using light-emitting diodes (LED) instead supposedly improves color reproduction over standard LCDs and cuts power consumption somewhat, but by far the most important improvement comes in the form of black-level performance. That's because individual sections of the backlight can be turned off independently and completely, a process Samsung calls "local dimming." As a result, black parts of the picture, such as the void of space or letterbox bars, actually look black instead of the darker gray typical of many flat-panel displays.

Although many LCD HDTVs this year offer a 120Hz refresh rate, the LN-T4681F refreshes its image at the standard 60Hz. In comparison, the less-expensive, non-LED-backlit LN-T71F series refreshes at 120Hz. We haven't seen many benefits of 120Hz by itself, although we have seen some marked improvements caused by antijudder technology, which the 81F also lacks. The set does include a feature called "LED Motion Plus," which, according to Samsung, cycles the LED backlight in eight horizontal sections, once every frame in sync with the LCD, to avoid illuminating LCDs when they're turning off, and thus eliminating "a majority of visible image lag." That sounds well and good, but we encountered a quirk with this feature that discouraged us from engaging it.

Other picture adjustments abound on the LN-T4681F. We liked the ability to adjust the three picture modes independently for each input, allowing us to customize each source with three different groups of picture settings. Only Movie mode allows full adjustment, however, so we recommend using it for the most demanding viewing conditions.

In addition to the five presets for color temperature, there's a full set of detailed color temperature controls. Labeled "white balance," they offer both gain and offset adjustments for red, green, and blue, which allows more advanced users to really zero in the set's grayscale. The My Color control, on the other hand, doesn't seem to do much of anything helpful, so we left it in the default positions. The selection of secondary picture controls includes items labeled "black level," which affects shadow detail; dynamic contrast, which adjusts black level on the fly; gamma, which affects the rate of progression from dark to light; and a selection for color gamut, which controls the range of colors the display can reproduce.

We appreciated the solid collection of aspect ratio controls, which include four choices for HD sources. Just Scan is our favorite because it introduces no overscan and does not scale 1080i or 1080p sources, preserving the dot-by-dot match to the TV's native pixels. Standard-def sources allow four choices, as well, including two zoom modes you can adjust vertically to see subtitles or obscure tickers, for example. The Samsung also has a picture-in-picture function that allows it to display two programs at once.

The setup menu controls include, among other items, the energy-saving function of the LN-T46681F. You can choose from four different energy saver modes, which limit peak light output (backlight intensity) to conserve power. As promised, even at full strength the LED backlight does consume less energy than most traditional CCFL backlights we've tested, and the "local dimming" function has the added benefit of cutting power consumption during darker scenes--much like a plasma (see The Basics of TV power for details). The LN-T4681F consumed just a bit less power (about $2 per year) than the former champ, the 46-inch Sony KDL-46S3000 in its default setting. See the Juice Box for complete details.

Like many 2007 HDTVs, the Samsung LN-T4681F offers three HDMI inputs, as opposed to just two, and all are HDMI 1.3-compatible, for what it's worth. Two are on the back, while a third can be found in a recessed bay along the panel's left side. The Samsung's commendable connectivity continues by including a pair of component-video inputs; an AV input with S-Video and composite video; two RF inputs for cable and antenna; and a VGA-style RGB input for computers. That recessed bay offers an additional AV input with S-Video and composite video, a headphone jack, and a USB port that can interface with thumb drives to display photos (JPEG only) and play music (MP3 only).

Performance

It's not a stretch to call the Samsung LN-T4681F's picture quality a breakthrough. For anyone sitting in the sweet spot in front of the set, watching in a dark room, it delivers better overall picture quality -- namely black levels and color accuracy--than any HDTV we've tested so far. What prevents it from earning our highest praise is its performance to people sitting to either side of the sweet spot and, to a lesser extent, viewing the TV with the room lights on.

Setup: We began as always by setting up the Samsung LN-T4681F for optimal image quality in our completely darkened theater. After setting maximum light output to a comfortable 40 FTL and adjusting black levels accordingly, we tweaked the set's white balance controls to closer approach the standard of 6500K--although the default Warm2 setting measured relatively close to begin with. After calibration the grayscale measured relatively linear, although it did dip a bit into red in very dark areas.

As we mentioned above, we also noticed one unusual issue with LED Motion Plus. Engaging the feature automatically pegs the backlight control at the maximum setting. In and of itself this isn't a big deal because on the LN-T4681F, as opposed to conventional LCDs, you can still achieve optimally dark black levels with a high backlight setting since the backlight actually turns off (and you can set maximum light output using the contrast control, so you don't lose any adjustability). The problem is that when we turned off the TV while LED Motion Plus was engaged, then turned it back on again, maximum light output jumped from our ideal 40 FTL to about double that, without us touching an adjustment. Weirdly, simply selecting LED Motion Plus in the menu, without even turning it on or off, was enough to re-attenuate the backlight back to 40. Because we didn't want to have to remember to do that every time we turned on the TV, we decided to leave LED Motion Plus turned off. We don't consider that a big loss anyway since we had a difficult time spotting image lag even with the feature turned off. For our full user-menu settings, click here or check out the Tips & Tricks section.

After getting every setting to our liking we sat down to compare the Samsung directly with a few other HDTVs we had on-hand, including Pioneer's PDP-5080HD and PRO-FHD1 as well as Samsung's own FP-T5084--all 50-inch plasmas--along with a pair of LCDs: Sony's KDL-46XBR4 and JVC's LT-47X898. We slipped Transformers into our Toshiba HD-XA2 HD DVD player and sat back to see how the LN-T4681F stacked up.

Black levels and color: Here's the pull-quote: The Samsung can produce the deepest shade of black of any flat-panel HDTV we've tested, regardless of technology. When the screen faded to black or showed a mostly-black background in our completely dark, black-walled test lab, the TV basically disappeared. That's because the LED backlight actually turns off when there's nothing on the screen, whereas the other plasmas and LCDs in the room still emitted light. Screens rarely stay black for long, however; what really matters is a TV's black-level performance with actual program material. To gauge that we compared the Samsung directly with our current reference for black level, the Pioneer PDP-5080HD.

Black areas in most scenes, such as the letterbox bars above and below the picture, the void of space around the spinning Cube during the Transformers intro, and the shadows under the wing of the troop transport plane and in the depths of the cabin, for example, appeared slightly darker on the Pioneer. Don't get us wrong; the difference wasn't night and day (or even 10 p.m. and midnight), but when we paid careful attention to both over the course of the movie, the Pioneer did win in most cases. We could coax a deeper black out of both sets by reducing their brightness controls, of course, but doing that obscured details in shadows. The Sony, for its part, still managed to display a respectable level of black, but it was slightly outpaced by the other two. Those three HDTVs, in turn, produced better black levels than the other sets in the room. To sum it up, while the Samsung definitely produces the deepest shade of black in isolated circumstances including mostly black scenes, the Pioneer still holds the crown for best overall black-level performance with the majority of mixed-brightness program material.

A quick aside for the geeks: The discrepancy between the Samsung's black levels showing a fully black screen vs. real program material was supported by further testing. For instance, the Samsung's black screen was immeasurable by our KM CS-200. However, when we looked at a standard checkerboard pattern--which includes both white and black, and so better represents actual program material--the Samsung's blacks were not only measurable, but lighter than the Sony's and the Pioneer's. We suspect the main culprit here is blooming (see below), where the bright white squares next to the darker ones spoiled that absolute black. Either way, these objective tests jibe with our subjective experience, which is that the Samsung gets extremely dark on full-black screens, but that performance doesn't translate to the very best black-level performance with most program material.

Back to Transformers: As the sun set on the tarmac after the mysterious chopper lands, we had a good opportunity to appreciate the Samsung's superb shadow detail. For example, we could make out the camo of the shadowed soldiers and details in the Decepticon's jet engine; it all looked quite natural yet packed with the punch only great contrast can deliver.

We did see one small fly in the black-level ointment, however. The LEDs produced what's known as "blooming," when a bright onscreen item exceeds its boundaries and brightens the dark areas immediately adjacent. When the Transformers title came up in a field of black, for example, or when Earth spun around to be cut off by the black letterbox bars, the black areas next to the lettering and the planet brightened in comparison to the other sets in the room, which exhibited no blooming. In most scenes, however, blooming was difficult to detect, especially outside the letterbox bars, and we never found it outright distracting except when we watched the set from off-angle. We also expected the Samsung, since its LEDs do vary in intensity, to fail our black-level retention test, but it passed with aplomb after calibration; the levels of black and near-black remained constant relative to one another regardless of the brightness of other areas of the screen (blooming notwithstanding).

The Samsung LN-T4681F evinced superb overall color accuracy, surpassing both the Pioneer PDP-5080HD and the Sony. Its solid grayscale and excellent primary colors combined to rival the color reproduction of the PRO-FHD1, our current color reference, and its black levels contributed greatly to perceived saturation and richness, easily outdoing the FHD1 in overall punch. The grass and trees around the Pentagon and the lake, the blue sky above the choppers in the desert, even Jon Voight's ruddy mug looked natural, realistic and rich, and the ubiquitous midriff of Mikaela Banes looked deeply tan without a hint of sunburn.

Video processing: As we expected, the film looked incredibly sharp and well-detailed, although, as usual, we did not distinguish any difference in detail between the Samsung and the other sets in the room, including the lower-resolution Pioneer, which looked every bit as sharp, from our seating distance of about 7 feet. According to test patterns, the LN-T4681F delivered every line of 1080i and 1080p sources when set to Just Scan mode. Like many sets we've tested, it did not deinterlace 1080i film-based sources properly, and in our one real-world deinterlacing test, the end of Chapter 6 of Ghost Rider, the grille of the RV showed more moir and artifacts than we saw on sets that passed, such as the JVC and the PRO-FHD1. As always, spotting other instances of the effect of improper 1080i deinterlacing was difficult, and we don't consider this failure a major issue.

We also didn't notice any serious instances of motion blur or image lag during the film, regardless of whether we engaged LED Motion Plus, which supposedly helps prevent such lag if it occurs. Looking at our favorite ESPNHD ticker, the edges of the letters looked a bit softer on the LN-T4681F than on the other TVs regardless of what setting we chose for LED Motion Plus. On other program material we watched, however, the Samsung maintained a sharp image, even during the quick action of a basketball game and the lightning activity of the big set-piece fights in Transformers.

Other performance considerations: All of our observations of LN-T4681F's picture quality were made, as usual, from the sweet spot directly in front of the TV with our eyes lined up with the middle of the screen. From off-angle, however, the LN-T4681F's black levels grew noticeably less black, which, of course, impeded saturation, too. We've seen the same effect on all LCDs we've reviewed, but on the LN-T4681F it was quite a bit more noticeable. When we moved just one seat over on the couch, for example, the letterbox bars and black of space in the opening "Cube" section appeared appreciably brighter than on the Sony seen from the same angle. From extreme angles, the Samsung's black areas looked brighter than any TVs' in the room; blacks on the Sony, again, stayed much truer from extreme angles. The Samsung's blooming effects also became more noticeable when seen from off-angle. Given its poor off-angle performance, videophiles who want to experience the LN-T4681F's best picture quality will have to really duke it out for the sweet spot (luckily that stand swivels!). As always, the plasmas in the room looked basically the same from any angle.

Compared with most other LCDs we've tested, the LN-T4681F exhibited very good uniformity across the screen, although not quite as good as the Sony. Looking at gray-field test patterns, the only issue we saw was a tendency in mid-dark fields (about 25-15 IRE) for the left and right sides of the image to appear brighter than the middle. This issue was difficult to spot in program material, so we don't consider it a big deal.

Like that of the LN-T4665F, the LN-T4681F's shiny screen proved a distraction. We could see ourselves reflected in the screen when the picture showed any moderately dark material while room lighting was moderate to bright. As we type this passage watching an NBA playoff game, for example, the silver strip lining the edge of our laptop, as well as our orange shirt and even the beige universal remote, are visible in any dark areas, including the circle of the Spurs' court and the Blazers' uniforms. None of the other sets in the room, including the plasmas, reflected as much ambient light. We asked Samsung whether the shiny screen had any impact on contrast ratio, and while the company's reps explained that some benefit to the CR spec is derived from the screen's supposed ability to limit interference from ambient light, they said the LED backlight's local dimming was a much larger factor affecting CR. We'd love to see a version of this set without the reflective screen, but we'll probably have to wait till next year for that.

As we've mentioned before, standard-def TV programs can often arrive via a high-definition resolution (depending on your cable or satellite box), which can make a high-def TV's standard-def processing a moot point. For people who do connect a true standard-def source, however, such as the 480i component-video input we used, the LN-T4681F will deliver a slightly below-average performance. It did poorly on the jaggies tests, doing little to smooth out the edges of diagonal lines or the stripes in the waving American flag. While it had no trouble resolving every line of DVD resolution, fine details like the stones in the bridge and the grass appeared a hair softer than on the Sony and the Pioneer, for example. When we looked at HQV's noisy shots of skies and sunsets, we saw that the Samsung's four levels of noise reduction had a very slight impact from one to the other, although in some areas we could discern the benefit of using High as opposed to Off. We still recommend leaving it in Off unless video noise becomes bothersome. Finally the set engaged 2:3 pull-down quickly and effectively, cleaning up the moir in the grandstand behind the racecar.

With PC sources originating on DVI and connected to the Samsung's HDMI port, the LN-T4681F performed extremely well, as we expect from 1080p flat-panel LCDs. In Just Scan mode the set resolved every detail of 1920x1080 sources according to DisplayMate, with no overscan and excellent sharpness in 10-point text and other fine details. PC performance dropped off a bit when we switched to the set's analog VGA input; while resolution was still full with no overscan, onscreen objects appeared a bit softer, and we detected some interference in the highest horizontal resolution patterns.

We were frankly surprised by the dropoff in analog PC quality because Samsung's 1080p sets, both plasma and LCD, are usually superb in this regard, but at the end of the day it won't matter to most users. The analog VGA input is still perfectly serviceable for casual connections, and serious PC users will want to go in via HDMI anyway.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

India enters supercomputing race

Friday, November 16, 2007

BlueGene/L
BlueGene/L has got significantly faster in recent months
A computer system designed in India has made it into a top ten of the world's fastest supercomputers.

Computer giant IBM continues to dominate the list - which is compiled twice a year - with a total of 232 out of the top 500 supercomputers.

Its Blue Gene/L supercomputer - used to ensure the US nuclear weapons stockpile remains safe and reliable - comes out at number one.

The Indian system - known as EKA - made it into fourth place.

The world's fastest supercomputer - BlueGene/L - has been significantly upgraded in the last six months.

It can now deliver a sustained performance of 478 trillion calculations per second (478 teraflops), nearly three times faster than any other machine on the list.

Petaflop barrier

Second place went to another IBM system - a newer version of BlueGene/L known as BlueGene/P. The system, introduced this June is the first in a batch of IBM machines designed to operate at a petaflop and beyond.

Breaking the petaflop barrier - the ability to process 1,000 trillion calculations every second - has long been a key milestone in supercomputing and would allow highly detailed simulations.

For example in earthquake simulations it could show building-by-building movements of regions in earthquake zones, improving future structural designs.

India has also entered the exclusive list for the first time with a Hewlett-Packard designed system that has a performance of 117.9 teraflops.

Codenamed EKA - Sanskrit for number one - it is installed at the Computational Research Laboratories in Pune.

The system will be initially targeted at developing applications such as neural, molecular and crash simulations, and digital media animation and rendering.

"The supercomputer system will have a direct effect on the lives of Indians, espcially in areas such as earthquake and Tsunami modelling, modellings of the economy and potential for drug design," said Mr S. Ramadorai, chairman of the Computational Research Laboratories, which is a subsidiary of Indian firm Tata.

The next step for the system is to put more applications on it.

"While the ranking is important the more important thing is to keep on improving performance and applications," said Mr Ramadorai.

Third place on the top 500 list went to a new supercomputing centre based in New Mexico.

Fifth place went to another Hewlett-Packard system installed at a Swedish government agency.In pictures Iran sanctions It's quiz time!

Source from: news.bbc.co.uk

Review: Samsung LCD HDTV will impress the staunchest videophile

art.samsung_ln-t4681.jpg

(CNET.com) -- Among that tiny segment of the population that cares about the latest HDTV technology, and the even tinier segment that can afford it, the introduction of Samsung's 81 series of flat-panel LCDs is kind of like early Christmas. The first widely distributed LCD HDTVs to incorporate LED backlights -- Sony sold a few Qualia 005s a couple years ago at $8,000 to $15,000 a pop -- the Samsungs promise amazing black levels, claiming a contrast ratio spec of 500,000:1.

The subject of this review, the 46-inch LN-T4681F, does indeed offer the amazing ability to basically disappear in a dark room when displaying a dark scene. That's a tremendous accomplishment for any display, but in the end it's not quite enough to earn our highest praise, because the TV's poor off-angle performance and shiny screen hobble its real-world picture quality in the face of stiff competition, especially given its premium price point.

Those issues aside, there's no doubt the Samsung LN-T4681F will make videophiles who can afford it grin with pleasure every time the screen fades to black.

Leave it to Samsung to put together yet another ultrasleek HDTV. The LN-T4681F continues the company's trend of clothing its panels entirely in glossy black, although this model takes things a step further with a few noteworthy accents. The most noticeable consists of a pair of vertical clear acrylic strips running along either edge of the panel. Cupped to deflect sound from the side-mounted speakers into the room, they also serve to support another pair of vertical strips, these made of solid dark gray material that seems a bit out of place among all that gloss.

The overall effect, especially considering the rather wide expanse of glossy black frame between the screen and the clear strips, is of a very wide HDTV; an effect that's further enhanced by the relatively narrow top and bottom sections of the frame around the screen. All told, the LN-T4681F measures 48.4 by 29.6 by 12.6 inches and weighs about 77 pounds including the swivel stand; sans stand, it measures 48.4 by 27 by 4.4 inches and weighs 66 pounds.

Unfortunately the LN-T4681F is saddled with the same shiny screen we complained about during our review of the LN-T4665F. While it catches the eye on the sales floor and lets you check your hair, those benefits are outweighed by its distracting reflectivity under normal room lighting (see Performance).

Samsung's remote is almost the same as last year, and we generally found that the slender wand was easy to operate. Only the keys for volume, channel, and device control (the universal clicker can command four other pieces of gear) are illuminated, but that's better than most TV remotes, which skip backlighting altogether. All of the buttons are nicely separated and differentiated, with the exception of the secondary controls clustered at the clicker's base, which kind of blend together. We'd like to see dedicated buttons for each input, although because the set automatically senses and skips inactive inputs, cycling between sources is less arduous than usual. The menu system is easy to navigate, and we appreciated the text explanations that accompanied the selections.

Features

The reason the Samsung LN-T4681F costs significantly more than any LCD TV at its screen size has to do with its backlight. On flat-panel LCDs, the backlight is what powers the picture, and it's generally made of cold-cathode fluorescents (CCFL). Using light-emitting diodes (LED) instead supposedly improves color reproduction over standard LCDs and cuts power consumption somewhat, but by far the most important improvement comes in the form of black-level performance. That's because individual sections of the backlight can be turned off independently and completely, a process Samsung calls "local dimming." As a result, black parts of the picture, such as the void of space or letterbox bars, actually look black instead of the darker gray typical of many flat-panel displays.

Although many LCD HDTVs this year offer a 120Hz refresh rate, the LN-T4681F refreshes its image at the standard 60Hz. In comparison, the less-expensive, non-LED-backlit LN-T71F series refreshes at 120Hz. We haven't seen many benefits of 120Hz by itself, although we have seen some marked improvements caused by antijudder technology, which the 81F also lacks. The set does include a feature called "LED Motion Plus," which, according to Samsung, cycles the LED backlight in eight horizontal sections, once every frame in sync with the LCD, to avoid illuminating LCDs when they're turning off, and thus eliminating "a majority of visible image lag." That sounds well and good, but we encountered a quirk with this feature that discouraged us from engaging it.

Other picture adjustments abound on the LN-T4681F. We liked the ability to adjust the three picture modes independently for each input, allowing us to customize each source with three different groups of picture settings. Only Movie mode allows full adjustment, however, so we recommend using it for the most demanding viewing conditions.

In addition to the five presets for color temperature, there's a full set of detailed color temperature controls. Labeled "white balance," they offer both gain and offset adjustments for red, green, and blue, which allows more advanced users to really zero in the set's grayscale. The My Color control, on the other hand, doesn't seem to do much of anything helpful, so we left it in the default positions. The selection of secondary picture controls includes items labeled "black level," which affects shadow detail; dynamic contrast, which adjusts black level on the fly; gamma, which affects the rate of progression from dark to light; and a selection for color gamut, which controls the range of colors the display can reproduce.

We appreciated the solid collection of aspect ratio controls, which include four choices for HD sources. Just Scan is our favorite because it introduces no overscan and does not scale 1080i or 1080p sources, preserving the dot-by-dot match to the TV's native pixels. Standard-def sources allow four choices, as well, including two zoom modes you can adjust vertically to see subtitles or obscure tickers, for example. The Samsung also has a picture-in-picture function that allows it to display two programs at once.

The setup menu controls include, among other items, the energy-saving function of the LN-T46681F. You can choose from four different energy saver modes, which limit peak light output (backlight intensity) to conserve power. As promised, even at full strength the LED backlight does consume less energy than most traditional CCFL backlights we've tested, and the "local dimming" function has the added benefit of cutting power consumption during darker scenes--much like a plasma (see The Basics of TV power for details). The LN-T4681F consumed just a bit less power (about $2 per year) than the former champ, the 46-inch Sony KDL-46S3000 in its default setting. See the Juice Box for complete details.

Like many 2007 HDTVs, the Samsung LN-T4681F offers three HDMI inputs, as opposed to just two, and all are HDMI 1.3-compatible, for what it's worth. Two are on the back, while a third can be found in a recessed bay along the panel's left side. The Samsung's commendable connectivity continues by including a pair of component-video inputs; an AV input with S-Video and composite video; two RF inputs for cable and antenna; and a VGA-style RGB input for computers. That recessed bay offers an additional AV input with S-Video and composite video, a headphone jack, and a USB port that can interface with thumb drives to display photos (JPEG only) and play music (MP3 only).

Performance

It's not a stretch to call the Samsung LN-T4681F's picture quality a breakthrough. For anyone sitting in the sweet spot in front of the set, watching in a dark room, it delivers better overall picture quality -- namely black levels and color accuracy--than any HDTV we've tested so far. What prevents it from earning our highest praise is its performance to people sitting to either side of the sweet spot and, to a lesser extent, viewing the TV with the room lights on.

Setup: We began as always by setting up the Samsung LN-T4681F for optimal image quality in our completely darkened theater. After setting maximum light output to a comfortable 40 FTL and adjusting black levels accordingly, we tweaked the set's white balance controls to closer approach the standard of 6500K--although the default Warm2 setting measured relatively close to begin with. After calibration the grayscale measured relatively linear, although it did dip a bit into red in very dark areas.

As we mentioned above, we also noticed one unusual issue with LED Motion Plus. Engaging the feature automatically pegs the backlight control at the maximum setting. In and of itself this isn't a big deal because on the LN-T4681F, as opposed to conventional LCDs, you can still achieve optimally dark black levels with a high backlight setting since the backlight actually turns off (and you can set maximum light output using the contrast control, so you don't lose any adjustability). The problem is that when we turned off the TV while LED Motion Plus was engaged, then turned it back on again, maximum light output jumped from our ideal 40 FTL to about double that, without us touching an adjustment. Weirdly, simply selecting LED Motion Plus in the menu, without even turning it on or off, was enough to re-attenuate the backlight back to 40. Because we didn't want to have to remember to do that every time we turned on the TV, we decided to leave LED Motion Plus turned off. We don't consider that a big loss anyway since we had a difficult time spotting image lag even with the feature turned off. For our full user-menu settings, click here or check out the Tips & Tricks section.

After getting every setting to our liking we sat down to compare the Samsung directly with a few other HDTVs we had on-hand, including Pioneer's PDP-5080HD and PRO-FHD1 as well as Samsung's own FP-T5084--all 50-inch plasmas--along with a pair of LCDs: Sony's KDL-46XBR4 and JVC's LT-47X898. We slipped Transformers into our Toshiba HD-XA2 HD DVD player and sat back to see how the LN-T4681F stacked up.

Black levels and color: Here's the pull-quote: The Samsung can produce the deepest shade of black of any flat-panel HDTV we've tested, regardless of technology. When the screen faded to black or showed a mostly-black background in our completely dark, black-walled test lab, the TV basically disappeared. That's because the LED backlight actually turns off when there's nothing on the screen, whereas the other plasmas and LCDs in the room still emitted light. Screens rarely stay black for long, however; what really matters is a TV's black-level performance with actual program material. To gauge that we compared the Samsung directly with our current reference for black level, the Pioneer PDP-5080HD.

Black areas in most scenes, such as the letterbox bars above and below the picture, the void of space around the spinning Cube during the Transformers intro, and the shadows under the wing of the troop transport plane and in the depths of the cabin, for example, appeared slightly darker on the Pioneer. Don't get us wrong; the difference wasn't night and day (or even 10 p.m. and midnight), but when we paid careful attention to both over the course of the movie, the Pioneer did win in most cases. We could coax a deeper black out of both sets by reducing their brightness controls, of course, but doing that obscured details in shadows. The Sony, for its part, still managed to display a respectable level of black, but it was slightly outpaced by the other two. Those three HDTVs, in turn, produced better black levels than the other sets in the room. To sum it up, while the Samsung definitely produces the deepest shade of black in isolated circumstances including mostly black scenes, the Pioneer still holds the crown for best overall black-level performance with the majority of mixed-brightness program material.

A quick aside for the geeks: The discrepancy between the Samsung's black levels showing a fully black screen vs. real program material was supported by further testing. For instance, the Samsung's black screen was immeasurable by our KM CS-200. However, when we looked at a standard checkerboard pattern--which includes both white and black, and so better represents actual program material--the Samsung's blacks were not only measurable, but lighter than the Sony's and the Pioneer's. We suspect the main culprit here is blooming (see below), where the bright white squares next to the darker ones spoiled that absolute black. Either way, these objective tests jibe with our subjective experience, which is that the Samsung gets extremely dark on full-black screens, but that performance doesn't translate to the very best black-level performance with most program material.

Back to Transformers: As the sun set on the tarmac after the mysterious chopper lands, we had a good opportunity to appreciate the Samsung's superb shadow detail. For example, we could make out the camo of the shadowed soldiers and details in the Decepticon's jet engine; it all looked quite natural yet packed with the punch only great contrast can deliver.

We did see one small fly in the black-level ointment, however. The LEDs produced what's known as "blooming," when a bright onscreen item exceeds its boundaries and brightens the dark areas immediately adjacent. When the Transformers title came up in a field of black, for example, or when Earth spun around to be cut off by the black letterbox bars, the black areas next to the lettering and the planet brightened in comparison to the other sets in the room, which exhibited no blooming. In most scenes, however, blooming was difficult to detect, especially outside the letterbox bars, and we never found it outright distracting except when we watched the set from off-angle. We also expected the Samsung, since its LEDs do vary in intensity, to fail our black-level retention test, but it passed with aplomb after calibration; the levels of black and near-black remained constant relative to one another regardless of the brightness of other areas of the screen (blooming notwithstanding).

The Samsung LN-T4681F evinced superb overall color accuracy, surpassing both the Pioneer PDP-5080HD and the Sony. Its solid grayscale and excellent primary colors combined to rival the color reproduction of the PRO-FHD1, our current color reference, and its black levels contributed greatly to perceived saturation and richness, easily outdoing the FHD1 in overall punch. The grass and trees around the Pentagon and the lake, the blue sky above the choppers in the desert, even Jon Voight's ruddy mug looked natural, realistic and rich, and the ubiquitous midriff of Mikaela Banes looked deeply tan without a hint of sunburn.

Video processing: As we expected, the film looked incredibly sharp and well-detailed, although, as usual, we did not distinguish any difference in detail between the Samsung and the other sets in the room, including the lower-resolution Pioneer, which looked every bit as sharp, from our seating distance of about 7 feet. According to test patterns, the LN-T4681F delivered every line of 1080i and 1080p sources when set to Just Scan mode. Like many sets we've tested, it did not deinterlace 1080i film-based sources properly, and in our one real-world deinterlacing test, the end of Chapter 6 of Ghost Rider, the grille of the RV showed more moir and artifacts than we saw on sets that passed, such as the JVC and the PRO-FHD1. As always, spotting other instances of the effect of improper 1080i deinterlacing was difficult, and we don't consider this failure a major issue.

We also didn't notice any serious instances of motion blur or image lag during the film, regardless of whether we engaged LED Motion Plus, which supposedly helps prevent such lag if it occurs. Looking at our favorite ESPNHD ticker, the edges of the letters looked a bit softer on the LN-T4681F than on the other TVs regardless of what setting we chose for LED Motion Plus. On other program material we watched, however, the Samsung maintained a sharp image, even during the quick action of a basketball game and the lightning activity of the big set-piece fights in Transformers.

Other performance considerations: All of our observations of LN-T4681F's picture quality were made, as usual, from the sweet spot directly in front of the TV with our eyes lined up with the middle of the screen. From off-angle, however, the LN-T4681F's black levels grew noticeably less black, which, of course, impeded saturation, too. We've seen the same effect on all LCDs we've reviewed, but on the LN-T4681F it was quite a bit more noticeable. When we moved just one seat over on the couch, for example, the letterbox bars and black of space in the opening "Cube" section appeared appreciably brighter than on the Sony seen from the same angle. From extreme angles, the Samsung's black areas looked brighter than any TVs' in the room; blacks on the Sony, again, stayed much truer from extreme angles. The Samsung's blooming effects also became more noticeable when seen from off-angle. Given its poor off-angle performance, videophiles who want to experience the LN-T4681F's best picture quality will have to really duke it out for the sweet spot (luckily that stand swivels!). As always, the plasmas in the room looked basically the same from any angle.

Compared with most other LCDs we've tested, the LN-T4681F exhibited very good uniformity across the screen, although not quite as good as the Sony. Looking at gray-field test patterns, the only issue we saw was a tendency in mid-dark fields (about 25-15 IRE) for the left and right sides of the image to appear brighter than the middle. This issue was difficult to spot in program material, so we don't consider it a big deal.

Like that of the LN-T4665F, the LN-T4681F's shiny screen proved a distraction. We could see ourselves reflected in the screen when the picture showed any moderately dark material while room lighting was moderate to bright. As we type this passage watching an NBA playoff game, for example, the silver strip lining the edge of our laptop, as well as our orange shirt and even the beige universal remote, are visible in any dark areas, including the circle of the Spurs' court and the Blazers' uniforms. None of the other sets in the room, including the plasmas, reflected as much ambient light. We asked Samsung whether the shiny screen had any impact on contrast ratio, and while the company's reps explained that some benefit to the CR spec is derived from the screen's supposed ability to limit interference from ambient light, they said the LED backlight's local dimming was a much larger factor affecting CR. We'd love to see a version of this set without the reflective screen, but we'll probably have to wait till next year for that.

As we've mentioned before, standard-def TV programs can often arrive via a high-definition resolution (depending on your cable or satellite box), which can make a high-def TV's standard-def processing a moot point. For people who do connect a true standard-def source, however, such as the 480i component-video input we used, the LN-T4681F will deliver a slightly below-average performance. It did poorly on the jaggies tests, doing little to smooth out the edges of diagonal lines or the stripes in the waving American flag. While it had no trouble resolving every line of DVD resolution, fine details like the stones in the bridge and the grass appeared a hair softer than on the Sony and the Pioneer, for example. When we looked at HQV's noisy shots of skies and sunsets, we saw that the Samsung's four levels of noise reduction had a very slight impact from one to the other, although in some areas we could discern the benefit of using High as opposed to Off. We still recommend leaving it in Off unless video noise becomes bothersome. Finally the set engaged 2:3 pull-down quickly and effectively, cleaning up the moir in the grandstand behind the racecar.

With PC sources originating on DVI and connected to the Samsung's HDMI port, the LN-T4681F performed extremely well, as we expect from 1080p flat-panel LCDs. In Just Scan mode the set resolved every detail of 1920x1080 sources according to DisplayMate, with no overscan and excellent sharpness in 10-point text and other fine details. PC performance dropped off a bit when we switched to the set's analog VGA input; while resolution was still full with no overscan, onscreen objects appeared a bit softer, and we detected some interference in the highest horizontal resolution patterns.

We were frankly surprised by the dropoff in analog PC quality because Samsung's 1080p sets, both plasma and LCD, are usually superb in this regard, but at the end of the day it won't matter to most users. The analog VGA input is still perfectly serviceable for casual connections, and serious PC users will want to go in via HDMI anyway.


Source from: edition.cnn.com

Shrinking chips use novel recipe

Sunday, November 11, 2007

45nm test wafer
Other firms are also working on chips with 45nm features
The chip industry's unrelenting quest to build smaller, faster microchips has taken another step forward.

Chip-maker Intel has launched a range of processors, known as Penryn, which will power the next generation of PCs.

The tiny chips contain a novel material and have features just 45 nanometres (billionths of a metre) wide.

The only PC processor in the line-up of 16 chips packs 820 million of the tiny switches into an area little bigger than a postage stamp.

"Had we used the same transistors that we used in our chips 15 to 20 years ago, the chip would be about the size of a two-storey building," said Bill Kircos of Intel.

Paul Otellini, head of Intel, described the challenge of building the chips as "awe-inspiring".

Although the chip-maker is the first company to make microprocessors with such tiny features, other companies, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), are producing other types of silicon chip.

"We have 45nm designs in production," said Chuck Byers of the firm.

TSMC manufactures chips on behalf of other companies.

Material world

The launch of the new multi-core chips comes nearly 60 years after the transistor was invented.

The brainchild of three scientists working at the research labs of the US Bell System telephone company, the tiny switches have gone on to underpin the silicon age.

The first transistors were crude devices made of several different materials and many centimetres tall.

Over the last six decades, scientists have refined the devices and can now pack millions of them on to a square of silicon.

The onward progression of the silicon industry is known as Moore's Law, and states that the numbers of transistors on a chip will double every two years.

However, as the industry devices have shrunk, researchers have been forced to confront major technical obstacles.

In the latest generation of Intel chips, critical elements of the transistors, known as gate dielectrics, do not perform as well.

As a result, currents passing through the transistors leak, reducing the effectiveness of the chip.

To overcome this, Intel has replaced the gate dielectrics, previously made from silicon dioxide, with a material based on the metal hafnium.

Hafnium is a so-called high-K material, which refers to its dielectric constant, and has a greater ability to store electrical charge than silicon dioxide.

The exact recipe for the new material has not been revealed but Intel says that it offers greater performance at such tiny scales.

Intel co-founder Gordon Moore has described the inclusion of hafnium as "one of the biggest transistor advancements in 40 years".

Tiny tweaks

In contrast, TSMC has said that its chips do not use the new material.

"We have an alternative process that we believe has even more performance value," said Mr Byers.

"One of the strategies we employ is to make it [a manufacturing process] accessible as possible and one of the ways you do that is to change the process as little as possible."

Rather than changing the design of the chips, TSMC has tweaked the manufacturing process to produce the tiny features.

"We work very hard to maintain performance levels with existing materials," said Mr Byers. "For instance, at 45nm there are only a couple or three changes."

"There are several ways to skin this cat," added Gareth Jones, also of TSMC.

However, other companies have signalled their intention to start production of microchips using similar hafnium technology.

IBM, which has developed rival technology with Toshiba, Sony and AMD, intends to incorporate the transistors into its chips in 2008.

Hewlett Packard, Lenovo and Dell have already said that they will use the new Penryn processors in top of the range PCs.

No rush for gold Survivors' stories In pictures

Source from: news.bbc.co.uk